Kenyon successfully obtained for our clients, Mattel and Fisher-Price, summary judgment on all trademark, trade dress and federal unfair competition claims. Fisher-Price had for many years sold a very successful toy called MAGNADOODLE, a trademark licensed to Fisher-Price by Pilot. After the license expired, Fisher-Price commenced sale of a virtually identical toy, but under the trademark DOODLE PRO. Pilot claimed both that it owned all of the trade dress in the toy and its packaging, and that use of DOODLE PRO was likely to cause confusion among consumers with the products of its new licensee for MAGNADOODLE, Ohio Art. Following extensive briefing and argument over the course of six months, the Court granted Kenyon's motion on behalf of the defendants to dismiss the claims. Case number 3:04-cv-00977 (2007).